Correction to: Deep brain stimulation of symptom-specific networks in Parkinson’s disease (Nature Communications, (2024), 15, 1, (4662), 10.1038/s41467-024-48731-1)

Nanditha Rajamani*, Helen Friedrich, Konstantin Butenko, Till Dembek, Florian Lange, Pavel Navrátil, Patricia Zvarova, Barbara Hollunder, Rob M. A. de Bie, Vincent J. J. Odekerken, Jens Volkmann, Xin Xu, Zhipei Ling, Chen Yao, Petra Ritter, Wolf-Julian Neumann, Georgios P. Skandalakis, Spyridon Komaitis, Aristotelis Kalyvas, Christos KoutsarnakisGeorge Stranjalis, Michael Barbe, Vanessa Milanese, Michael D. Fox, Andrea A. Kühn, Erik Middlebrooks, Ningfei Li, Martin Reich, Clemens Neudorfer, Andreas Horn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

Correction to: Nature Communicationshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48731-1, published online 31 May 2024 The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 2, in which the statistical analyses in the insets of panel B were incorrectly reported. Permutation tests were inadvertently reported instead of circular tests and cross-validation values. The correct version of Figure 2 is: (Figure presented.) Which replaces the previous incorrect version: (Figure presented.) The original version of this Article contained an error in the text in the third paragraph of the results section ‘Symptom-Response Multi-Tract Model (Discovery Cohort)’ on page 3, which incorrectly read ‘Here, all symptom tracts significantly explained more variance in outcomes than re-calculated tract models after permuting improvement values across patients 1000 times (p < 0.001). Second, we subjected tract models to cross-validations. Here, all but the tremor tract model explained statistically significant amounts of variance when subjected to 10-fold cross-validations (bradykinesia: R = 0.20, p = 0.02; rigidity R = 0.20, p = 0.02; axial symptoms R = 0.22, p = 0.01, also see Fig. 2)’. The correct version states ‘Here, the bradykinesia and rigidity tracts significantly explained more variance in outcomes than re-calculated tract models after permuting improvement values across patients 1,000 times (p < 0.05). Second, we subjected tract models to cross-validations. Here, all but the tremor tract model explained statistically significant amounts of variance when subjected to 10-fold cross-validations (bradykinesia: R = 0.20, p = 0.02; rigidity R = 0.20, p = 0.02; axial symptoms R = 0.22, p = 0.01, also see Fig. 2)’. The original version of this Article contained an error in the text in the figure legend of Figure 2 for panel B, which incorrectly read ‘B Symptom-response tracts visualized separately at the STN level with the other tracts grayed out for spatial comparison. Insets represent permutation tests and 10-fold cross-validation results for each symptom tract’. The correct version states ‘B Symptom-response tracts visualized separately at the STN level with the other tracts grayed out for spatial comparison. Insets represent circular and 10-fold cross-validation results for each symptom tract’. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7120
JournalNature communications
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Deep brain stimulation of symptom-specific networks in Parkinson’s disease (Nature Communications, (2024), 15, 1, (4662), 10.1038/s41467-024-48731-1)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this