Correction to: Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app (Behavior Research Methods, (2020), 53, 4, (1385-1406), 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0)

Suzanne Jak; Terrence D. Jorgensen; Mathilde G. E. Verdam; Frans J. Oort; Louise Elffers

doi:10.3758/s13428-024-02571-5

Correction to: Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app (Behavior Research Methods, (2020), 53, 4, (1385-1406), 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0)

Suzanne Jak
, Terrence D. Jorgensen
, Mathilde G. E. Verdam
, Frans J. Oort
, Louise Elffers

University of Amsterdam
Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The original online version of this article was revised: The following sentences from page 1396 were updated as indicated. The model contains 25 freely estimated parameters. Was updated to: 35 freely estimated parameters. Therefore, this model has 120 − 25 = 95 df. Was updated to: 120 - 35 = 85 df. The resulting power to reject not-close fit equals 0.854. Was updated to: 0.816 The app indicates that for a power of 0.80, we would need a sample size of 183. Was updated to: 195. The figure in Example 4 has been corrected to show the changes made by the updates. (Figure presented.)

Original language	English
Article number	53
Pages (from-to)	53
Number of pages	1
Journal	Behavior research methods
Volume	57
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02571-5
Publication status	Published - 9 Jan 2025

Access to Document

10.3758/s13428-024-02571-5

Correction-to.pdfFinal published version, 552 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{9ab93a06d2ed4cf194a77caeb084aa57,

title = "Correction to: Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app (Behavior Research Methods, (2020), 53, 4, (1385-1406), 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0)",

abstract = "The original online version of this article was revised: The following sentences from page 1396 were updated as indicated. The model contains 25 freely estimated parameters. Was updated to: 35 freely estimated parameters. Therefore, this model has 120 − 25 = 95 df. Was updated to: 120 - 35 = 85 df. The resulting power to reject not-close fit equals 0.854. Was updated to: 0.816 The app indicates that for a power of 0.80, we would need a sample size of 183. Was updated to: 195. The figure in Example 4 has been corrected to show the changes made by the updates. (Figure presented.)",

author = "Suzanne Jak and Jorgensen, \{Terrence D.\} and Verdam, \{Mathilde G. E.\} and Oort, \{Frans J.\} and Louise Elffers",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",

year = "2025",

month = jan,

day = "9",

doi = "10.3758/s13428-024-02571-5",

language = "English",

volume = "57",

pages = "53",

journal = "Behavior research methods",

issn = "1554-351X",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "1",

}

Correction to: Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app (Behavior Research Methods, (2020), 53, 4, (1385-1406), 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0). / Jak, Suzanne; Jorgensen, Terrence D.; Verdam, Mathilde G. E. et al.
In: Behavior research methods, Vol. 57, No. 1, 53, 09.01.2025, p. 53.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app (Behavior Research Methods, (2020), 53, 4, (1385-1406), 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0)

AU - Jak, Suzanne

AU - Jorgensen, Terrence D.

AU - Verdam, Mathilde G. E.

AU - Oort, Frans J.

AU - Elffers, Louise

PY - 2025/1/9

Y1 - 2025/1/9

N2 - The original online version of this article was revised: The following sentences from page 1396 were updated as indicated. The model contains 25 freely estimated parameters. Was updated to: 35 freely estimated parameters. Therefore, this model has 120 − 25 = 95 df. Was updated to: 120 - 35 = 85 df. The resulting power to reject not-close fit equals 0.854. Was updated to: 0.816 The app indicates that for a power of 0.80, we would need a sample size of 183. Was updated to: 195. The figure in Example 4 has been corrected to show the changes made by the updates. (Figure presented.)

AB - The original online version of this article was revised: The following sentences from page 1396 were updated as indicated. The model contains 25 freely estimated parameters. Was updated to: 35 freely estimated parameters. Therefore, this model has 120 − 25 = 95 df. Was updated to: 120 - 35 = 85 df. The resulting power to reject not-close fit equals 0.854. Was updated to: 0.816 The app indicates that for a power of 0.80, we would need a sample size of 183. Was updated to: 195. The figure in Example 4 has been corrected to show the changes made by the updates. (Figure presented.)

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214872549

U2 - 10.3758/s13428-024-02571-5

DO - 10.3758/s13428-024-02571-5

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 39789209

SN - 1554-351X

VL - 57

SP - 53

JO - Behavior research methods

JF - Behavior research methods

IS - 1

M1 - 53

ER -

Correction to: Analytical power calculations for structural equation modeling: A tutorial and Shiny app (Behavior Research Methods, (2020), 53, 4, (1385-1406), 10.3758/s13428-020-01479-0)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this