Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Context, implementation, and mechanisms of impact of a stepped-care WHO psychological intervention for migrants with psychological distress

  • Beatrice Compri
  • , Giulia Turrini*
  • , Marianna Purgato
  • , Richard Bryant
  • , Paula Cristobal
  • , Josep Maria Haro
  • , Raffael Kalisch
  • , Vincent Lorant
  • , David McDaid
  • , Kerry R. McGreevy
  • , Roberto Mediavilla
  • , Michela Nosè
  • , A. La Park
  • , Papoula Petri-Romão
  • , Aurélia Roversi
  • , Marit Sijbrandij
  • , Andrea Tortelli
  • , Anke Witteveen
  • , Corrado Barbui
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Verona
  • University of New South Wales
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu
  • Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Centro de Investigación Biomèdica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Pôle Psychiatrie Précarité

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3090 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Migrants often experience psychological distress due to pre-, peri- and post-migration stressors. Scalable interventions like Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM) and Problem Management Plus (PM+) have been developed to address these challenges. This study evaluates a stepped-care program combining DWM and PM+ for migrants in Italy, examining its context, implementation, and mechanisms of impact. A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial (RCT), following the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. Post-trial qualitative data were collected through individual interviews with intervention participants (n = 10) and stakeholders (n = 10), as well as a focus group with intervention providers (n = 8). Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo. Cultural stigma and practical barriers influenced engagement, while community leaders fostered trust and participation. Interventions were feasible and acceptable. Digital delivery improved accessibility for some but posed challenges for those with low technological literacy or private spaces. The stepped-care approach supported gradual engagement with mental health strategies, enhancing self-care and emotional awareness, while provider relationships were key to sustaining motivation. The stepped-care model alleviated psychological distress and was well-received. Findings underscore the need for cultural sensitivity, digital accessibility and community engagement to optimize migrant mental health support.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere62
JournalGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)
Volume12
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • mental health
  • migrants
  • process evaluation
  • psychological distress
  • psychological intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Context, implementation, and mechanisms of impact of a stepped-care WHO psychological intervention for migrants with psychological distress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this