Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians

  • Jerome R. Lechien*
  • , Ahmed Geneid
  • , J. rg E. Bohlender
  • , Giovanna Cantarella
  • , Juan C. Avellaneda
  • , Gauthier Desuter
  • , Elisabeth V. Sjogren
  • , Camille Finck
  • , Stephane Hans
  • , Markus Hess
  • , Haldun Oguz
  • , Marc J. Remacle
  • , Berit Schneider-Stickler
  • , Miroslav Tedla
  • , Antonio Schindler
  • , Isabel Vilaseca
  • , Michal Zabrodsky
  • , Frederik G. Dikkers
  • , Lise Crevier-Buchman
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Saint-Pierre University Hospital
  • Universite de Mons
  • Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3
  • Helsinki University Hospital
  • University Hospital Zürich
  • IRCCS Fondazione Ca'Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - Milano
  • University of Milan
  • Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi
  • University of Antwerp
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • University of Liege
  • Medical Voice Center (MEVOC)
  • Fonomer
  • Center Hospitalier de Luxembourg
  • University of Vienna
  • Comenius University
  • Hospital Clinic Barcelona
  • University of Barcelona
  • Charles University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: To update the European guidelines for the assessment of voice quality (VQ) in clinical practice. Methods: Nineteen laryngologists–phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) and the Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP) participated to a modified Delphi process to propose statements about subjective and objective VQ assessments. Two anonymized voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 3/4. The statements with ≥ 3/4 score by 60–80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected. Results: Of the 90 initial statements, 51 were validated after two voting rounds. A multidimensional set of minimal VQ evaluations was proposed and included: baseline VQ anamnesis (e.g., allergy, medical and surgical history, medication, addiction, singing practice, job, and posture), videolaryngostroboscopy (mucosal wave symmetry, amplitude, morphology, and movements), patient-reported VQ assessment (30- or 10-voice handicap index), perception (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), aerodynamics (maximum phonation time), acoustics (Mean F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio), and clinical instruments associated with voice comorbidities (reflux symptom score, reflux sign assessment, eating-assessment tool-10, and dysphagia handicap index). For perception, aerodynamics and acoustics, experts provided guidelines for the methods of measurement. Some additional VQ evaluations are proposed for voice professionals or patients with some laryngeal diseases. Conclusion: The ELS-UEP consensus for VQ assessment provides clinical statements for the baseline and pre- to post-treatment evaluations of VQ and to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated VQ evaluation approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5459-5473
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS)
Volume280
Issue number12
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Consensus
  • Dysphonia
  • European
  • Evaluation
  • Guidelines
  • Head
  • Neck
  • Otolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Voice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this