Abstract
The use of an additive solution for substitution of plasma for storage of leukodepleted platelet concentrates can have many advantages. In this study, a comparison was made between two platelet additive solutions: one containing citrate and acetate (PAS-II), the other also supplemented with additional salts such as magnesium, and with gluconate (Composol-PS). Donor-dependent differences were avoided by applying a paired experimental design (n = 10). The platelet concentrates were prepared by pooling five buffy coats and the additive solution, and prestorage filtration was utilized to remove leucocytes to well below 1 x 106. Storage of platelet concentrates up to 9 days after blood collection revealed that platelet concentrates in Composol-PS maintained an almost constant pH of on average 6.93 from day 2 through day 7, and at 6.90 at day 9. This was in contrast to PAS-II, which showed a gradually decreasing pH from on average 6.97 at day 1 to 6.86 at day 9. In all units stored in both solutions the swirling effect was present during 9 days of storage. In conclusion, both additive solutions allow storage of platelets, derived from pooled buffy coats, for up to 9 days after collection of the whole blood, with maintenance of good quality in vitro. Composol-PS has a slightly better buffering capacity, reflected as a more constant pH throughout the storage period
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 193-197 |
| Journal | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of two platelet additive solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver