Abstract
We compared real-time LightCycler and TaqMan assays and the GP5+/6+ PCR/enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to assess the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) load in cervical scrape specimens. Both real-time PCR assays determined the HPV16 load in scrape specimens similarly. The level of agreement between these assays and the GP5+/6+ PCR/EIA was low (P = 0.004), suggesting that the latter method is not suited for quantifying HPV16 DNA.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4868-4871 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of clinical microbiology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver