Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens

  • A. T. Hesselink
  • , A. J.C. Van Den Brule
  • , Z. M.A. Groothuismink
  • , M. Molano
  • , J. Berkhof
  • , C. J.L.M. Meijer
  • , P. J.F. Snijders*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • VU Medisch Centrum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We compared real-time LightCycler and TaqMan assays and the GP5+/6+ PCR/enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to assess the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) load in cervical scrape specimens. Both real-time PCR assays determined the HPV16 load in scrape specimens similarly. The level of agreement between these assays and the GP5+/6+ PCR/EIA was low (P = 0.004), suggesting that the latter method is not suited for quantifying HPV16 DNA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4868-4871
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of clinical microbiology
Volume43
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this