Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 1.5 compared with 3.0 g oral slow-release mesalazine (Pentasa) in the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dutch Pentasa Study Group

  • P. Fockens
  • , C. J. Mulder
  • , G. N. Tytgat
  • , P. Blok
  • , J. Ferwerda
  • , S. G. Meuwissen
  • , H. A. Tuynman
  • , W. Dekker
  • , K. Gasthuis
  • , P. A. van Hees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To investigate a possible dose-effect relationship with two dosages of oral slow-release mesalazine in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. One hundred and sixty-nine patients with ulcerative colitis in remission were treated with either 1.5 or 3.0 g/day mesalazine for 1 year or until relapse into active colitis. Fewer of the 3.0 g dose group relapsed than of the 1.5 g dose group (33 compared with 46%). This difference failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.057). A significant relationship between age and relapse rate was established. No dose-related adverse events were found. Three serious drug-related adverse events were, however, reported. All of the serious adverse reactions resolved after the medication was discontinued. There is a trend for high doses of oral mesalazine to be more effective in prevention of relapse of ulcerative colitis. These higher doses are not associated with a higher incidence of adverse reactions
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1025-1030
JournalEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 1.5 compared with 3.0 g oral slow-release mesalazine (Pentasa) in the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dutch Pentasa Study Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this