Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of standard culture methods, a shell vial assay, and a DNA probe for the detection of herpes simplex virus

  • L. A. Seal*
  • , P. S. Toyama
  • , K. M. Fleet
  • , K. S. Lerud
  • , S. R. Heth
  • , A. J. Moorman
  • , J. C. Woods
  • , R. B. Hill
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A nonradioactive, biotinylated herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA probe, a shell vial (rabbit kidney cell) culture assay enhanced by a direct fluorescent (HSV monoclonal)-antibody stain at 16 to 20 h postinoculation, and conventional tube cultures with confirmation via HSV-specific (polyclonal antibody) immunoperoxidase assay were compared for 199 specimens. The predictive values of the positive results were 54.5% for the probe, 95.9% for the shell vial assay, and 100% for the conventional culture methods, while the predictive values of the negative tests were 68.1, 84.0, and 98.4%, respectively. We conclude that the DNA probe (sensitivity, 24.5%; specificity, 88.3%) and the shell vial assay (sensitivity, 66.2%; specificity, 98.4%) cannot be substituted for conventional tube culture techniques (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 100%) in the routine identification of HSV in our laboratory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-652
JournalJournal of clinical microbiology
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of standard culture methods, a shell vial assay, and a DNA probe for the detection of herpes simplex virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this