Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of Event-Based Analysis Versus Trend-Based Analysis in the Detection of Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography 3-Dimensional Rim Measurements

  • Tamara D. Scott
  • , Maria A. Guzman Aparicio
  • , Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul
  • , Hang Lee
  • , Michele Zemplenyi
  • , Edem Tsikata
  • , Milica A. Margeta
  • , Courtney L. Ondeck
  • , Anne L. Coleman
  • , Fei Yu
  • , Johannes F. de Boer
  • , Teresa C. Chen*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Tufts University
  • Harvard University
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear
  • Chulalongkorn University
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • VA Medical Center
  • University of California at Los Angeles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Précis: Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detects OCT structural progression in more patients and at an earlier time point. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detects progression more often than RNFL thickness. Purpose: To determine whether event-based or trend-based analysis best detects glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and minimum distance band (MDB) neuroretinal rim measurements. Methods: Over 5 years, 124 open angle glaucoma patients had yearly dilated eye examinations, disc photography, Humphrey visual field (HVF 24-2) testing, 2-dimensional (2D) OCT RNFL thickness measurements, and 3-dimensional (3D) OCT MDB rim measurements, all on the same day. One eye of each patient was analyzed, which was randomly selected if both eyes from a patient were eligible. Using global RNFL thickness and global MDB rim thickness, event-based progression was defined as change greater than normal aging change and expected inter-test variability. Trend-based analysis used linear regression with progression defined as rate of decline greater than age-related decline. Results: The average follow-up for the 124 open angle glaucoma patients was 66.9±16.4 months. Event-based analysis was better than trend-based analysis because it detected progression in more patients (15.3% by RNFL event-based analysis versus 8.1% by RNFL trend-based analysis, P=0.025; 52.4% by MDB event-based analysis versus 9.7% by MDB trend-based analysis, P<0.001) and earlier (RNFL: mean 28.8 vs. 63.2 mo; P<0.001; MDB: mean 30.7 vs. 56.2 mo; P<0.003) whether using MDB rim thickness or RNFL thickness. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detected progression more often than RNFL thickness (52.4% vs. 15.3%; P<0.001). Conclusions: Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detected OCT structural progression in more glaucoma patients and at an earlier time point.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10.1097/IJG.0000000000002573
Pages (from-to)616-624
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of glaucoma
Volume34
Issue number8
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • event-based analysis
  • glaucoma
  • optical coherence tomography
  • progression
  • trend-based analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Event-Based Analysis Versus Trend-Based Analysis in the Detection of Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography 3-Dimensional Rim Measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this