Abstract
Background: Secondary progressive MS is associated with a worse prognosis, warranting the need for early predictive tools. The DAAE score estimates the five-year risk of transition to clinical diagnosis of SPMS, showing a 38 % risk in high-risk patients in Amsterdam and Buffalo data. The DAAE score remains to be validated against objective disease progression criteria. Methods: External validation using data from the Prague MS cohort and MSBase-Lorscheider criteria. Results: Among 2022 patients from the Prague MS database, 14.3 % clinically progressed according to MSbase-Lorscheider criteria over five years. Risk increased with higher DAAE scores comparable to the Amsterdam and Buffalo data; secondary validation showed an AUROC of 0.742 with faster progression for higher risk groups (p < 0.05), therapy-adjusted. Conclusion: The DAAE score performs similarly between centers and using objective criteria. These validation steps support its use in personalized MS management and treatment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106423 |
| Journal | Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders |
| Volume | 98 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2025 |
Keywords
- External validation
- Objective criteria
- Prognostic tool
- Risk Stratification
- Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
- disease progression
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical risk stratification: Prague validation of the DAAE score, a clinical tool for estimating risk of disesase progression in multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver