Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Chemotherapy switch for localized pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Esther N. Dekker
  • , Raja R. Narayan
  • , Mohamed A. Ahmami
  • , Anis Meddouch
  • , Eva M. M. Verkolf
  • , Anne M. Gehrels
  • , Marc G. H. Besselink
  • , Casper H. J. van Eijck
  • , Marjolein Y. V. Homs
  • , Bianca Mostert
  • , Grainne M. O'kane
  • , Roeland F. de Wilde
  • , Johanna W. Wilmink
  • , Eileen M. O'reilly
  • , Motaz Qadan
  • , Bas Groot Koerkamp*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Harvard University
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Patients with localized (that is non-metastatic) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with an inadequate response or toxicity to first-line chemotherapy may benefit from chemotherapy switch. The aim was to explore the available data on the use and effect of chemotherapy switch, as reported in the literature. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), the Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar on 1 December 2023. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients who underwent chemotherapy switch and the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response and resection, R0 resection, and ypN0 resection rates after chemotherapy switch. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: A total of five retrospective studies, representing 863 patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, were included and 226 of the 863 patients underwent chemotherapy switch. In four studies, first-line chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan with oxaliplatin ('FOLFIRINOX') and patients were switched to gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel. Reasons for chemotherapy switch included an inadequate biochemical, clinical, or radiological response, or toxicity. Three studies compared patients who underwent chemotherapy switch with patients who only received first-line chemotherapy and found that the proportion of patients who underwent chemotherapy switch was 20.5% (95% c.i. 10.5% to 36.3%). The pooled resection rate after chemotherapy switch was 42.0% (95% c.i. 16.6% to 72.5%). Two studies compared the chance of resection after chemotherapy switch versus first-line chemotherapy alone and found a risk ratio of 0.88 (95% c.i. 0.65 to 1.18). Two studies, with a combined total of 576 patients, found similar postoperative survival for patients who underwent chemotherapy switch and patients who only received first-line chemotherapy. Conclusion: One in five patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma underwent chemotherapy switch after an inadequate response or toxicity to first-line chemotherapy. The pooled resection rate after chemotherapy switch was 42% and similar in overall survival compared with first-line chemotherapy only. Three ongoing trials are investigating chemotherapy switch in patients with an inadequate radiological or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberznae244
JournalBritish journal of surgery
Volume111
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chemotherapy switch for localized pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this