Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Characterization of flufylline, fluprofylline, ritanserin, butanserin and R 56413 with respect to in‐vivo α1‐, α2‐ and 5‐HT2‐receptor antagonism and in‐vitro affinity for α1‐, α2‐ and 5‐HT2‐receptors: comparison with ketanserin

  • C. Korstanje*
  • , R. Sprenkels
  • , H. N. Doods
  • , J. G. Hugtenburg
  • , E. Boddeke
  • , H. D. Batink
  • , M. J.M.C. Thoolen
  • , P. A. Van Zwieten
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The experimental drugs butanserin (R 53393), ritanserin (R 55667), R 56413, flufylline (Sgd 195/78) and fluprofylline (Sgd 144/80) were evaluated with respect to their antagonism at postjunctional α1‐ and α2‐adrenoceptors and 5‐HT2‐receptors in pithed rats. Moreoever, affinity for [3H]mianserin, [3H]prazosin and [3H]yohimbine binding sites was assessed using rat brain preparations. In all experiments ketanserin was taken as a reference compound. It is concluded that of the compounds investigated butanserin is the most potent and selective α1‐adrenoceptor antagonist, whereas ritanserin was found to be a potent and selective 5‐HT2‐antagonist. Of the other compounds, fluprofylline was a very selective though not very potent α1‐adrenoceptor antagonist. The other compounds were less active and less selective in this respect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)374-379
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of pharmacy and pharmacology
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1986

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characterization of flufylline, fluprofylline, ritanserin, butanserin and R 56413 with respect to in‐vivo α1‐, α2‐ and 5‐HT2‐receptor antagonism and in‐vitro affinity for α1‐, α2‐ and 5‐HT2‐receptors: comparison with ketanserin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this