Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cardiac stem cell treatment in myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies

  • Peter Paul Zwetsloot
  • , Anna Maria Dorothea Végh
  • , Sanne Johanna Jansen Of Lorkeers
  • , Gerardus P. J. van Hout
  • , Gillian L. Currie
  • , Emily S. Sena
  • , Hendrik Gremmels
  • , Jan Willem Buikema
  • , Marie-Jose Goumans
  • , Malcolm R. Macleod
  • , Pieter A. Doevendans
  • , Steven A. J. Chamuleau
  • , Joost P. G. Sluijter*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Leiden University
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rationale: Cardiac stem cells (CSC) therapy has been clinically introduced for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction (MI). To date, there has been no systematic overview and meta-analysis of studies using CSC therapy for MI. Objective: Here, we used meta-analysis to establish the overall effect of CSCs in preclinical studies and assessed translational differences between and within large and small animals in the CSC therapy field. In addition, we explored the effect of CSC type and other clinically relevant parameters on functional outcome to better predict and design future (pre)clinical studies using CSCs for MI. Methods and Results: A systematic search was performed, yielding 80 studies. We determined the overall effect of CSC therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction and performed meta-regression to investigate clinically relevant parameters. We also assessed the quality of included studies and possible bias. The overall effect observed in CSC-treated animals was 10.7% (95% confidence interval 9.4-12.1; P<0.001) improvement in ejection fraction compared with placebo controls. Interestingly, CSC therapy had a greater effect in small animals compared with large animals (P<0.001). Meta-regression indicated that cell type was a significant predictor for ejection fraction improvement in small animals. Minor publication bias was observed in small animal studies. Conclusions: CSC treatment resulted in significant improvement of ejection fraction in preclinical animal models of MI compared with placebo. There was a reduction in the magnitude of effect in large compared with small animal models. Although different CSC types have overlapping culture characteristics, we observed a significant difference in their effect in post-MI animal studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1223-1232
JournalCirculation research
Volume118
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiac stem cell treatment in myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this