TY - JOUR
T1 - Bilateral symmetry assessment of healthy forearm kinematics using 4D-CT
AU - Oonk, Joris G. M.
AU - Dobbe, Johannes G. G.
AU - van der Zeeuw, Frederique T.
AU - Ettema, Loes
AU - Strijkers, Gustav J.
AU - Streekstra, Geert J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - Advanced stage distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) injury may warrant radius corrective osteotomy or arthroplasty. These procedures aim to restore geometry, function and kinematics and could benefit from preoperative planning where the contralateral forearm is typically used as reference. Natural variations regarding geometry and function between forearms are known but kinematic differences are not. This work aimed to quantify bilateral differences in forearm kinematics. Consequently, 4D-CT data of ten healthy volunteers was acquired, imaging motion of both forearm joints. Segmentation and registration of the radius and ulna bones resulted in a 3D representation of forearm rotation. Subsequently, the forearm rotation axis, radius translation along the ulna and radius rotation around its own inertial axis were calculated. The rotation axis of the right arm was mirrored to set up a comparison with the left arm. All other differences were calculated directly. The mean angle and distance between forearm rotation axes were 0.6° and 0.8 mm. The mean difference in radius translation along the ulna was 0.9 mm. On average, radius rotation around the radius’ inertial axis differed 2.6°, between forearms. This study's findings can benefit DRUJ surgery preoperative planning and postoperative kinematic evaluation. Level of evidence: IV.
AB - Advanced stage distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) injury may warrant radius corrective osteotomy or arthroplasty. These procedures aim to restore geometry, function and kinematics and could benefit from preoperative planning where the contralateral forearm is typically used as reference. Natural variations regarding geometry and function between forearms are known but kinematic differences are not. This work aimed to quantify bilateral differences in forearm kinematics. Consequently, 4D-CT data of ten healthy volunteers was acquired, imaging motion of both forearm joints. Segmentation and registration of the radius and ulna bones resulted in a 3D representation of forearm rotation. Subsequently, the forearm rotation axis, radius translation along the ulna and radius rotation around its own inertial axis were calculated. The rotation axis of the right arm was mirrored to set up a comparison with the left arm. All other differences were calculated directly. The mean angle and distance between forearm rotation axes were 0.6° and 0.8 mm. The mean difference in radius translation along the ulna was 0.9 mm. On average, radius rotation around the radius’ inertial axis differed 2.6°, between forearms. This study's findings can benefit DRUJ surgery preoperative planning and postoperative kinematic evaluation. Level of evidence: IV.
KW - 4D-CT
KW - Forearm
KW - Kinematics
KW - Radius
KW - Symmetry
KW - Ulna
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208171648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112417
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112417
M3 - Article
C2 - 39522123
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 177
JO - Journal of biomechanics
JF - Journal of biomechanics
M1 - 112417
ER -