Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bevacizumab for symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis after radiation of high-grade glioma or brain metastases – when and for whom?

  • Department of Neuro-Oncology
  • Department of Neuro-Oncology
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Department of Radiation Oncology
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Department of Radiology
  • Department of Neurology
  • Groene Hart Hospital
  • Department of Neurology
  • Utrecht University
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Department of Neurology
  • Leiden University
  • Department of Neurology
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
  • Department of Medical Oncology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a serious complication of high-dose radiotherapy in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and brain metastases (BM). Approximately half of the patients with radiological CRN develop debilitating neurological symptoms that significantly affect their neurocognitive functioning, performance status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), requiring treatment. While corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment for symptomatic CRN (sCRN), they have considerable drawbacks, including limited efficacy, severe side effects affecting various organ systems, and interference with concurrent therapies, such as immunotherapy. Prolonged corticosteroid use can lead to adrenal insufficiency and dependence on hormone replacement. Bevacizumab has been shown to reduce the contrast-enhancing CRN lesion on MRI and surrounding edema, improving clinical outcomes in most patients. However, most evidence comes from smaller, single-center, retrospective studies focusing on short-term radiological and clinical outcomes, typically in patients already treated with corticosteroids. Information on the optimal timing of bevacizumab administration and its long-term effects and impact on patient-reported outcomes, including HRQoL, is lacking. These limitations prevented the adoption of first-line bevacizumab treatment for sCRN in international guidelines and insurance coverage policies. A well-powered prospective clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of first-line bevacizumab versus corticosteroids in HGG and BM patients is essential.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberhttps://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf059
Pages (from-to)747-762
Number of pages16
JournalNeuro-oncology practice
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • bevacizumab
  • brain metastases
  • cerebral radiation necrosis
  • corticosteroids
  • glioma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bevacizumab for symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis after radiation of high-grade glioma or brain metastases – when and for whom?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this