Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

M N Bekker; L Henneman; M V E Macville; E A Sistermans; R J H Galjaard

doi:10.1002/uog.22030

Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

M N Bekker
, L Henneman
, M V E Macville
, E A Sistermans
, R J H Galjaard

University Medical Center Utrecht
Department of Obstetrics, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	695-696
Number of pages	2
Journal	Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume	55
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22030
Publication status	Published - 1 May 2020

Access to Document

10.1002/uog.22030

Benefit-vs-potential-harm-of-genome-wide-prenatal-cfdna-testing-requires-further-investigation-and-should-not-be-dismiss.pdfFinal published version, 68 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

Bekker, M. N., Henneman, L., Macville, M. V. E., Sistermans, E. A., & Galjaard, R. J. H. (2020). Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 55(5), 695-696. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22030

Bekker, M N ; Henneman, L ; Macville, M V E et al. / Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data. In: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 ; Vol. 55, No. 5. pp. 695-696.

@article{60d8e76da6ba4ebba32859ac2eb238f2,

title = "Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data",

author = "Bekker, \{M N\} and L Henneman and Macville, \{M V E\} and Sistermans, \{E A\} and Galjaard, \{R J H\}",

year = "2020",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/uog.22030",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

pages = "695--696",

journal = "Ultrasound in obstetrics \& gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology",

issn = "0960-7692",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd.",

number = "5",

}

Bekker, MN, Henneman, L, Macville, MVE, Sistermans, EA & Galjaard, RJH 2020, 'Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data', Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 695-696. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22030

Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data. / Bekker, M N; Henneman, L; Macville, M V E et al.
In: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 55, No. 5, 01.05.2020, p. 695-696.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

AU - Bekker, M N

AU - Henneman, L

AU - Macville, M V E

AU - Sistermans, E A

AU - Galjaard, R J H

PY - 2020/5/1

Y1 - 2020/5/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084888028

U2 - 10.1002/uog.22030

DO - 10.1002/uog.22030

M3 - Letter

SN - 0960-7692

VL - 55

SP - 695

EP - 696

JO - Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

IS - 5

ER -

Bekker MN, Henneman L, Macville MVE, Sistermans EA, Galjaard RJH. Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 May 1;55(5):695-696. doi: 10.1002/uog.22030

Benefit vs potential harm of genome-wide prenatal cfDNA testing requires further investigation and should not be dismissed based on current data

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this