Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations

  • Britton Trabert*
  • , Tim Waterboer
  • , Annika Idahl
  • , Nicole Brenner
  • , Louise A. Brinton
  • , Julia Butt
  • , Sally B. Coburn
  • , Patricia Hartge
  • , Katrin Hufnagel
  • , Federica Inturrisi
  • , Jolanta Lissowska
  • , Alexander Mentzer
  • , Beata Peplonska
  • , Mark E. Sherman
  • , Gillian S. Wills
  • , Sarah C. Woodhall
  • , Michael Pawlita
  • , Nicolas Wentzensen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Institutes of Health
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • Umeå University
  • German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology
  • University of Oxford
  • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
  • Imperial College London
  • UK Health Security Agency
  • University College London
  • Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been associated with ovarian cancer risk. To clarify the role of Chlamydia trachomatis and other infectious agents in the development of ovarian cancer, we evaluated the association of serologic markers with incident ovarian cancer using a staged approach in two independent populations. Methods: Studies included: 1) a case-control study in Poland (244 ovarian cancers/556 control subjects) and 2) a prospective nested case-control study in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial (160 ovarian cancers/159 control subjects). Associations of serologic marker levels with ovarian cancer risk at diagnostic as well as higher thresholds, identified in Poland and independently evaluated in PLCO, were estimated using multivariable adjusted logistic regression. Results: In the Polish study, antibodies (based on laboratory cut-point) against the chlamydia plasmid-encoded Pgp3 protein (serological gold standard) were associated with increased ovarian cancer risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 2.22); when a positive result was redefined at higher levels, ovarian cancer risk was increased (cut-point 2: OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.38 to 2.89; cut-point 3 [max OR]: OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.29 to 3.73). In the prospective PLCO study, Pgp3 antibodies were associated with elevated risk at the laboratory cut-point (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.78 to 2.63) and more stringent cut-points (cut-point 2: OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.71); cut-point 3: OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 0.63 to 10.08). In both studies, antibodies against other infectious agents measured were not associated with risk. Conclusions: In two independent populations, antibodies against prior/current C. trachomatis (Pgp3) were associated with a doubling in ovarian cancer risk, whereas markers of other infectious agents were unrelated. These findings lend support for an association between PID and ovarian cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-136
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume111
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antibodies against chlamydia trachomatis and ovarian cancer risk in two independent populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this