Abstract
Alfentanil by continuous intravenous infusion and isoflurane have been compared as anaesthetic agents for outpatient arthroscopy. In 42 patients, divided at random into two groups, anaesthesia was induced with methohexitone and vecuronium bromide, and, after intubation, maintained with nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen combined with alfentanil or isoflurane. Alfentanil was given before intubation (1 mg), as a loading dose before starting surgery (50 μg kg‐1) and by a continuous infusion at a rate of 1 μg kg‐1min‐1. Isoflurane was given in a concentration of 0.9% as a maintenance dose. Awakening from anaesthesia was morc rapid with alfentanil than with isoflurane. Recovery tests were applied in the recovery room. Both anarsrhetic techniques provided satisfactory anaesthesia and rapid recovery. All patients but one were content with the anaesthesia. The patients who received isoflurane scored better in the recovery tests in the first 3 h, but after 3 h there was no difference between the groups. The alfentanil group showed a higher incidence of nausea and/or vomiting: 45% compared to 14% in the isoflurane group. © 1986 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Fonden
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 329-331 |
| Journal | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1986 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Alfentanil v. isoflurane for outpatient arthroscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver