Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acalabrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of the First Randomized Phase III Trial

  • John C. Byrd
  • , Peter Hillmen
  • , Paolo Ghia
  • , Arnon P. Kater
  • , Asher Chanan-Khan
  • , Richard R. Furman
  • , Susan O'Brien
  • , Mustafa Nuri Yenerel
  • , Arpad Illés
  • , Neil Kay
  • , Jose A. Garcia-Marco
  • , Anthony Mato
  • , Javier Pinilla-Ibarz
  • , John F. Seymour
  • , Stephane Lepretre
  • , Stephan Stilgenbauer
  • , Tadeusz Robak
  • , Wayne Rothbaum
  • , Raquel Izumi
  • , Ahmed Hamdy
  • Priti Patel, Kara Higgins, Sophia Sohoni, Wojciech Jurczak
  • Ohio State University
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
  • Viral Evolution and Transmission Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, FL
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Istanbul University
  • University of Debrecen
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of South Florida
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Centre Georges-François Leclerc
  • Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Cote de Nacre, Normandy University, EA 4650, Caen, France
  • Ulm University
  • Medical University of Łódź
  • Acerta Pharma
  • AstraZeneca
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

122 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Among Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, acalabrutinib has greater selectivity than ibrutinib, which we hypothesized would improve continuous therapy tolerability. We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority, phase III trial comparing acalabrutinib and ibrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). METHODS: Patients with previously treated CLL with centrally confirmed del(17)(p13.1) or del(11)(q22.3) were randomly assigned to oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily or ibrutinib 420 mg once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed noninferiority of progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Overall, 533 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 268; ibrutinib, n = 265) were randomly assigned. At the data cutoff, 124 (46.3%) acalabrutinib patients and 109 (41.1%) ibrutinib patients remained on treatment. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months, acalabrutinib was determined to be noninferior to ibrutinib with a median PFS of 38.4 months in both arms (95% CI acalabrutinib, 33.0 to 38.6 and ibrutinib, 33.0 to 41.6; hazard ratio: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.27). All-grade atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter incidence was significantly lower with acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib (9.4% v 16.0%; P = .02); among other selected secondary end points, grade 3 or higher infections (30.8% v 30.0%) and Richter transformations (3.8% v 4.9%) were comparable between groups and median overall survival was not reached in either arm (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.15), with 63 (23.5%) deaths with acalabrutinib and 73 (27.5%) with ibrutinib. Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events occurred in 14.7% of acalabrutinib-treated patients and 21.3% of ibrutinib-treated patients. CONCLUSION: In this first direct comparison of less versus more selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in CLL, acalabrutinib demonstrated noninferior PFS with fewer cardiovascular adverse events.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3441-3452
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of clinical oncology
Volume39
Issue number31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acalabrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of the First Randomized Phase III Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this