Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Systematic Review and Independent Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Mesh Augmentation for Incisional Hernia Prevention after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery (I-PREVENT-AAA) A Collaborative European Hernia Society Project

  • Rudolf van den Berg*
  • , Floris P. J. den Hartog
  • , Sara J. Baart
  • , Christina Bali
  • , Miltiadis Matsagkas
  • , Paul M. Bevis
  • , Jonothan J. Earnshaw
  • , Eike S. Debus
  • , Susanne Honig
  • , Frederik Berrevoet
  • , Olivier Detry
  • , Cesare Stabilini
  • , Filip E. Muysoms
  • , Pieter J. Tanis
  • , Holger Diener
  • , Tilo Kölbel
  • , Wolfgang Reinpold
  • , European Hernia Society Prophylactic mesh study group collaborators
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • University of Ioannina
  • University of Thessaly
  • North Bristol NHS Trust
  • Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Hamburg
  • Hospital Robert Schuman Kirchberg Hospital
  • Ghent University
  • University of Liege
  • University of Genoa
  • Maria Middelares Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) of the abdominal wall following open aortic aneurysm repair as compared to primary sutured closure in preventing incisional hernia (IH) formation by performing an individual patient-data meta-analysis (IPDMA). Summary Background Data: IH is a prevalent complication after abdominal surgery, especially in high-risk groups. PMA of the abdominal wall has been studied as a preventive measure for IH-formation, but strong recommendations are lacking. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted till 23 September 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PMA with PS after open AAA surgery. Lead authors of eligible studies were asked to share individual patient-data. A one-stage analysis was performed, and Cox-regression analyses were used to assess time-to-event outcomes. Results: Five randomized trials with a total of 493 patients were included. Intention to treat analysis revealed that PMA was associated with significantly lower risk of IH (hazard ratio of 0.25 (95% CI 0.12-0.50)) as compared to PS closure. Three-year incisional hernia rates were 13.2% and 39.6%, respectively, with a number needed to treat of 3.7. The effect was similar for onlay and retro-rectus PMA. PMA resulted in longer operative time (mean 27 minutes) and more seroma formation (especially onlay PMA) but did not increase the risk of surgical site infection. Conclusions: PMA after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery is proven to be an effective measure to reduce IH formation and should be considered in future guidelines as standard of care.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of surgery
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2025

Keywords

  • aortic aneurysm
  • incisional hernia
  • prevention
  • surgical mesh
  • suture techniques

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Review and Independent Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Mesh Augmentation for Incisional Hernia Prevention after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery (I-PREVENT-AAA) A Collaborative European Hernia Society Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this