Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A qualitative study of barriers to the implementation of a rheumatoid arthritis guideline among generalist and specialist physical therapists

  • Leti van Bodegom-Vos
  • , John Verhoef
  • , Margot Dickmann
  • , Marjon Kleijn
  • , Ingrid van Vliet
  • , Emalie Hurkmans
  • , Philip van der Wees
  • , Thea Vliet Vlieland
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • University of Applied Sciences Leiden
  • Sport Medisch Centrum Oegstgeest
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Institute of Physical Therapy
  • Royal Dutch Society of Physical Therapy
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Maastricht University
  • Harvard University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Although the increasing complexity and expansion of the body of knowledge in physical therapy have led to specialized practice areas to provide better patient care, the impact of specialization on guideline implementation has been scarcely studied. Objectives The objective of this study was to identify the similarities and differences in barriers to the implementation of a Dutch rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guideline by generalist and specialist physical therapists. Design This observational study consisted of 4 focus group interviews in which 24 physical therapists (13 generalist and 11 specialist physical therapists) participated. Methods Physical therapists were asked to discuss barriers to the implementation of the RA guideline. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a directed approach to content analysis. Both the interviews and the interview analysis were informed by a previously developed conceptual framework. Results Besides a number of similarities (eg, lack of time), the present study showed important, although subtle, differences in barriers to the implementation of the RA guideline between generalist physical therapists and specialist physical therapists. Generalist physical therapists more frequently reported difficulties in interpreting the guideline (cognitive barriers) and had less favorable opinions about the guideline (affective barriers) than specialist physical therapists. Specialist physical therapists were hampered by external barriers that are outside the scope of generalist physical therapists, such as a lack of agreement about the roles and responsibilities of medical professionals involved in the care of the same patient. Conclusions The identified differences in barriers to the implementation of the RA guideline indicated that the effectiveness of implementation strategies could be improved by tailoring them to the level of specialization of physical therapists. However, it is expected that tailoring implementation strategies to barriers that hamper both generalist and specialist physical therapists will have a larger effect on the implementation of the RA guideline. © 2012 American Physical Therapy Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1292-1305
JournalPhysical therapy
Volume92
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A qualitative study of barriers to the implementation of a rheumatoid arthritis guideline among generalist and specialist physical therapists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this