Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A non-randomized risk-adjusted comparison of lenalidomide + R-CHOP versus R-CHOP for MYC-rearranged DLBCL patients

  • Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC (Location VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Erasmus MC
  • Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Maasstad Hospital
  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
  • Adrz Hospital
  • Amphia Hospital
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
  • University of Groningen
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Utrecht University
  • Leiden University
  • Amphia ziekenhuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Patients with MYC rearranged (MYC-R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis. Previously, we demonstrated in a single-arm phase II trial (HOVON-130) that addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP (R2CHOP) is well-tolerated and yields similar complete metabolic remission rates as more intensive chemotherapy regimens in literature. In parallel with this single-arm interventional trial, a prospective observational screening cohort (HOVON-900) was open in which we identified all newly diagnosed MYC-R DLBCL patients in the Netherlands. Eligible patients from the observational cohort that were not included in the interventional trial served as control group in the present risk-adjusted comparison. R2CHOP treated patients from the interventional trial (n = 77) were younger than patients in the R-CHOP control cohort (n = 56) (median age 63 versus 70 years, p = 0.018) and they were more likely to have a lower WHO performance score (p = 0.013). We adjusted for differences at baseline using 1:1 matching, multivariable analysis, and weighting using the propensity score to reduce treatment-selection bias. These analyses consistently showed improved outcome after R2CHOP with HRs of 0.53, 0.51, and 0.59, respectively, for OS, and 0.53, 0.59, and 0.60 for PFS. Thus, this non-randomized risk-adjusted comparison supports R2CHOP as an additional treatment option for MYC-R DLBCL patients. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
Original languageEnglish
Article number85
JournalBlood cancer journal
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A non-randomized risk-adjusted comparison of lenalidomide + R-CHOP versus R-CHOP for MYC-rearranged DLBCL patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this