Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A multicentric randomized controlled phase III trial of adaptive and 18F-FDG-PET-guided dose-redistribution in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ARTFORCE)

  • Anna Liza M. P. de Leeuw*
  • , Jordi Giralt
  • , Yungan Tao
  • , Sergi Benavente
  • , Thanh-V. n France Nguyen
  • , Frank J. P. Hoebers
  • , Ann Hoeben
  • , Chris H. J. Terhaard
  • , Lip Wai Lee
  • , Signe Friesland
  • , Roel J. H. M. Steenbakkers
  • , Lisa Tans
  • , Jolien Heukelom
  • , Mutamba T. Kayembe
  • , Simon R. van Kranen
  • , Harry Bartelink
  • , Coen R. N. Rasch
  • , Jan-Jakob Sonke
  • , Olga Hamming-Vrieze
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
  • Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy
  • Maastricht University
  • Utrecht University
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Groningen
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and purpose: This multicenter randomized phase III trial evaluated whether locoregional control of patients with LAHNSCC could be improved by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-guided dose-escalation while minimizing the risk of increasing toxicity using a dose-redistribution and scheduled adaptation strategy. Materials and methods: Patients with T3-4-N0-3-M0 LAHNSCC were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive a dose distribution ranging from 64-84 Gy/35 fractions with adaptation at the 10th fraction (rRT) or conventional 70 Gy/35 fractions (cRT). Both arms received concurrent three-cycle 100 mg/m2 cisplatin. Primary endpoints were 2-year locoregional control (LRC) and toxicity. Primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. Results: Due to slow accrual, the study was prematurely closed (at 84 %) after randomizing 221 eligible patients between 2012 and 2019 to receive rRT (N = 109) or cRT (N = 112). The 2-year LRC estimate difference of 81 % (95 %CI 74–89 %) vs. 74 % (66–83 %) in the rRT and cRT arm, respectively, was not found statistically significant (HR 0.75, 95 %CI 0.43–1.31, P=.31). Toxicity prevalence and incidence rates were similar between trial arms, with exception for a significant increased grade ≥ 3 pharyngolaryngeal stenoses incidence rate in the rRT arm (0 versus 4 %, P=.05). In post-hoc subgroup analyses, rRT improved LRC for patients with N0-1 disease (HR 0.21, 95 %CI 0.05–0.93) and oropharyngeal cancer (0.31, 0.10–0.95), regardless of HPV. Conclusion: Adaptive and dose redistributed radiotherapy enabled dose-escalation with similar toxicity rates compared to conventional radiotherapy. While FDG-PET-guided dose-escalation did overall not lead to significant tumor control or survival improvements, post-hoc results showed improved locoregional control for patients with N0-1 disease or oropharyngeal cancer treated with rRT.
Original languageEnglish
Article number110281
JournalRadiotherapy and oncology
Volume196
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • 18F-FDG PET
  • Adaptive radiotherapy
  • Chemoradiation
  • Dose escalation
  • Dose painting
  • Head and neck cancer
  • Oropharynx cancer
  • RCT
  • SCCHN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A multicentric randomized controlled phase III trial of adaptive and 18F-FDG-PET-guided dose-redistribution in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ARTFORCE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this