Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A decade of public engagement regarding human germline gene editing: a systematic scoping review

  • ‘The DNA dialogues’ Consortium
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Following the discovery of the CRISPR-Cas technology in 2012, there has been a growing global call for public engagement regarding the potential use of human germline gene editing (HGGE). In this systematic scoping review, we aim to evaluate public engagement studies considering the following questions based on three points of attention: 1) Inclusion of underrepresented groups: who have been engaged? 2) Gathering values: what output has been reported? 3) Reaching societal impact: what objectives of public engagement have been reported? A systematic literature search from 2012 to 2023 identified 3464 articles reporting on public engagement studies regarding HGGE retrieved from 12 databases. After screening, 52 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 36 articles that cover 31 public engagement studies. We conclude that co-created efforts are needed to engage underrepresented groups as well as to yield values rather than acceptance levels, and to concretise how engagement might result in societal impact.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean journal of human genetics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A decade of public engagement regarding human germline gene editing: a systematic scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this