Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Confirmatory and an Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) in a European Case Series of Patients with Dementia: Results from the RECage Study

  • Bruno Mario Cesana
  • , Eleni Poptsi*
  • , Magda Tsolaki
  • , Sverre Bergh
  • , Alfonso Ciccone
  • , Emmanuel Cognat
  • , Andrea Fabbo
  • , Sara Fascendini
  • , Giovanni B. Frisoni
  • , Lutz Frölich
  • , Maria Cristina Jori
  • , Patrizia Mecocci
  • , Paola Merlo
  • , Oliver Peters
  • , Carlo Alberto Defanti
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • International Centre for Rural Health of the San Paolo Hospital
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Greek Association of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust
  • Vestfold Hospital Trust
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma
  • Hôpital Fernand-Widal
  • Azienda USL di Modena
  • FERB Alzheimer Centre
  • University of Geneva
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Mediolanum Cardio Research
  • University of Perugia
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: One of the most widely used instruments for assessing agitation in dementia patients is the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), nevertheless no global score has been proposed. The aim of this study is: (a) to conduct a confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of CMAI on people with dementia and Psychological and Behavioral Symptoms (BPSD), and (b) to propose an alternative structure, based on clinical criteria including all CMAI items. Methods: Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were carried out on the CMAI 29 items administered at baseline to 505 patients with dementia (PwD) and BPSD enrolled in the international observational RECage study. Results: The three-factor structure has not been confirmed by the CFA, whilst the EFA was carried out respectively on 25 items disregarding 4 items with a prevalence ≤5% and then on 20 items disregarding 9 items with a prevalence ≤10%. The four-factor structure explaining 56% of the variance comprised Physically Aggressive behavior, Verbally Aggressive behavior, Physically non-aggressive behavior, and Physically and verbally aggressive behavior. Conclusions: A new grouping of all items according to a clinical criterion is proposed, allowing for a more sensible evaluation of the symptoms leading to better differentiation.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1025
JournalBrain Sciences
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CMAI
  • RECage study
  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • exploratory factor analysis
  • new model of scoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Confirmatory and an Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) in a European Case Series of Patients with Dementia: Results from the RECage Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this