A comparative study of the Osstell™ versus the Osstell Mentor™ to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles

R. S. Snijders; A. J. van Wijk; J. A. Lindeboom

doi:10.1111/joor.12093

A comparative study of the Osstell™ versus the Osstell Mentor™ to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles

R. S. Snijders, A. J. van Wijk, J. A. Lindeboom

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of dental implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell™ and Osstell Mentor™ devices and to investigate the reproducibility and comparability of the results obtained with these devices. Twenty-four Straumann implants (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) were placed in the anterior mandible of 12 fresh edentulous human cadaver mandibles. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured with the Osstell™ and Osstell Mentor™ when implants were inserted at 50% of their length and following their complete insertion. The Osstell™ device measured lower scores compared with the Osstell Mentor™. This was significant for the full position (mean difference = 9·9), t (11) = 7·4, P < 0·001 and for the halfway position (mean difference = 5·9), t (11) = 2·41, P = 0·03. In conclusion, the Osstell™ produced relatively lower ISQ scores than the Osstell Mentor™

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	774-779
Journal	Journal of oral rehabilitation
Volume	40
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12093
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.1111/joor.12093

Cite this

@article{8c50770ed7d6415197a28f7ee433c5a0,

title = "A comparative study of the Osstell{\texttrademark} versus the Osstell Mentor{\texttrademark} to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles",

abstract = "The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of dental implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell{\texttrademark} and Osstell Mentor{\texttrademark} devices and to investigate the reproducibility and comparability of the results obtained with these devices. Twenty-four Straumann implants (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) were placed in the anterior mandible of 12 fresh edentulous human cadaver mandibles. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured with the Osstell{\texttrademark} and Osstell Mentor{\texttrademark} when implants were inserted at 50% of their length and following their complete insertion. The Osstell{\texttrademark} device measured lower scores compared with the Osstell Mentor{\texttrademark}. This was significant for the full position (mean difference = 9·9), t (11) = 7·4, P < 0·001 and for the halfway position (mean difference = 5·9), t (11) = 2·41, P = 0·03. In conclusion, the Osstell{\texttrademark} produced relatively lower ISQ scores than the Osstell Mentor{\texttrademark}",

author = "Snijders, {R. S.} and {van Wijk}, {A. J.} and Lindeboom, {J. A.}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1111/joor.12093",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "774--779",

journal = "Journal of oral rehabilitation",

issn = "0305-182X",

publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of the Osstell™ versus the Osstell Mentor™ to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles

AU - Snijders, R. S.

AU - van Wijk, A. J.

AU - Lindeboom, J. A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of dental implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell™ and Osstell Mentor™ devices and to investigate the reproducibility and comparability of the results obtained with these devices. Twenty-four Straumann implants (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) were placed in the anterior mandible of 12 fresh edentulous human cadaver mandibles. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured with the Osstell™ and Osstell Mentor™ when implants were inserted at 50% of their length and following their complete insertion. The Osstell™ device measured lower scores compared with the Osstell Mentor™. This was significant for the full position (mean difference = 9·9), t (11) = 7·4, P < 0·001 and for the halfway position (mean difference = 5·9), t (11) = 2·41, P = 0·03. In conclusion, the Osstell™ produced relatively lower ISQ scores than the Osstell Mentor™

AB - The aim of this study was to assess the primary stability of dental implants by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) using the Osstell™ and Osstell Mentor™ devices and to investigate the reproducibility and comparability of the results obtained with these devices. Twenty-four Straumann implants (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) were placed in the anterior mandible of 12 fresh edentulous human cadaver mandibles. The implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured with the Osstell™ and Osstell Mentor™ when implants were inserted at 50% of their length and following their complete insertion. The Osstell™ device measured lower scores compared with the Osstell Mentor™. This was significant for the full position (mean difference = 9·9), t (11) = 7·4, P < 0·001 and for the halfway position (mean difference = 5·9), t (11) = 2·41, P = 0·03. In conclusion, the Osstell™ produced relatively lower ISQ scores than the Osstell Mentor™

U2 - 10.1111/joor.12093

DO - 10.1111/joor.12093

M3 - Article

C2 - 23981012

SN - 0305-182X

VL - 40

SP - 774

EP - 779

JO - Journal of oral rehabilitation

JF - Journal of oral rehabilitation

IS - 10

ER -