Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients

  • Vince B. C. Biemans
  • , Edo Savelkoul
  • , Ruben Y. Gabriëls
  • , Melek Simsek
  • , Gerard Dijkstra
  • , Marieke J. Pierik
  • , Rachel L. West
  • , Nanne K. H. de Boer
  • , Frank Hoentjen*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Maastricht UMC+
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University of Groningen
  • Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Hospital and Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Maastricht University
  • Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Both tioguanine and low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol (LDTA) can be considered for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when conventional thiopurines fail due to adverse events. Aim: To compare the safety of tioguanine and LDTA in IBD patients. Methods: Inflammatory bowel disease patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated LDTA in standard care were identified in the prospective ICC Registry. IBD patients who failed conventional thiopurines due to adverse events and initiated tioguanine were enrolled in three university hospitals. Patients on concomitant biologicals were excluded. The primary outcome was discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes included: safety outcomes and surgery-, biological- and corticosteroid-free clinical remission (physician global assessment = 0) after 104 weeks. Both multiple logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to correct for confounders. Results: In total, 182 IBD patients treated with tioguanine (n = 94) or LDTA (n = 88) were included with a median follow-up of 104 weeks (IQR 91-104). Of these, 19% (tioguanine: 20%, LDTA: 18%) of patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events. After adjusting for confounders, there were no differences in terms of discontinuation rate due to adverse events (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15-1.68, P = 0.26), adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44-1.81, P = 0.75), infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.40-2.73, P = 0.93), hospitalisations (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.64-6.23, P = 0.23) or clinical remission (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.33-1.68, P = 0.48). All results are comparable with the propensity score matched cohort. Conclusion: Nineteen percent of IBD patients with prior failure to conventional thiopurines due to adverse events discontinued therapy with tioguanine or LDTA due to adverse events. Either therapy may be considered before escalating to biological therapy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1076-1086
Number of pages11
JournalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative analysis of tioguanine versus low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol in inflammatory bowel disease patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this